Jump to content


Oakland County Lt Clay R Jansson; Disgusting Police Officer


  • Please log in to reply
8 replies to this topic

#1 Craven

Craven

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 1 posts

Posted 30 March 2011 - 02:25 PM

"LT CLAY JANSSON; A DISGUSTING POLICE OFFICER AND A DISGUSTING HUMAN BEING"

REPORTEDLY: The Breakdown: Oakland County Sgt Clay R. Jansson reportedly had a dating relationship with Julie Krohta, who went through a bitter divorce with her husband Richard Whitemore. Richard Whitmore received legal custody of their kids. After the divorce, Richards ex-wife (Julie) called 911 and reported that her ex-husband (Richard) was drinking alcohol at home with the kids present.(WOW what a crime!) Rochester Hills Deputies, who know Julie, respond, provoke, arrest and rough up Richard Whitemore. Oakland County Sgt. Clay R. Jansson, who reportedly dated Julie, gets involved the next day and conducts an emergency hearing to have Richard's children removed from the home, for the terrible crime of drinking alcohol in front of his own chidlren! Surpise, Sgt Clay R Jansson lost evidence which could have exonerated Richard Whitmore.

I bet Oakland County Sgt Clay Jansson has a fantastic relationship with his own children. I'm sure that this is not Oakland County Sgt Clay R. Jansson's first issue with immoral and unethical conduct.

Sgt. Clay R. Jansson, knowing his conniving and unethical conduct would be exposed through testimony, dismissed his DIRTY case at court.

Keep this in mind. Sgt Clay R Jansson, UNDER OATH IN FEDERAL COURT, denied that he knew Julie Krohta? The Citizen affadavit below, indicates Julie Knew Sgt Clay R. Jansson, Dated Him and wanted to marry him. How did Sgt. Clay R Jansson get away with this?

Following Jansson's dishonesty under oath in Federal Court, Sheriff Michael J. Bouchard Promoted Lt. Clay R. Jansson to Commander of the Commerce Twp Sub-station. A reward for his behavior?

Citizen Affadavit: https://docs.google....wYTNkNGQ3&hl=en

Testimony Under Oath: https://docs.google....xYmNkMGE2&hl=en

Citizen Complaint: https://docs.google....2NzBkMTk0&hl=en

Edited by Craven, 18 May 2012 - 03:30 PM.


#2 Crane

Crane

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 1 posts

Posted 30 March 2011 - 09:53 PM

According to my calculations, the Statute Of Limitations for Federal Perjury runs out on June 29th 2011, which would be five years from his testimony.
He's a cop, nothing can be done anyways- Who would care.

Can any attorneys shed light on this. What could potentially happen?


According to the Oakland Press, Clay Jansson is the Marijuana Facility Checker of Commerce Township. http://www.theoaklan....txt?viewmode=3

#3 Sublime

Sublime

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 12 posts

Posted 10 May 2011 - 03:23 PM

I think I am starting to see a pattern with how Sheriff Bouchard deals of Police Officers committing Crime.

WOLFGANG MUELLER: Thomas Mance received a demotion because to-wit, he had been stopped by
22 the West Bloomfield Township Police in June 25, '08?

23 UNDERSHERIFF MCCABE: Yes.

24 WOLFGANG MUELLER: He was traveling 60 in a 45, right?

25 UNDERSHERIFF MCCABE: Yes, sir.

1 WOLFGANG MUELLER: Swerved into the left lane multiple times?

2 UNDERSHERIFF MCCABE: Yes.

3 WOLFGANG MUELLER: Turns out he was .21%, correct?

4 UNDERSHERIFF MCCABE: Yes, sir.

5 WOLFGANG MUELLER: Two and a half times the legal limit?

6 UNDERSHERIFF MCCABE: Correct.

7 WOLFGANG MUELLER: Asked the officer for a favor. Does he give courtesy to County employees
8 because he was a deputy?

9 UNDERSHERIFF MCCABE: Yes, sir.

10 WOLFGANG MUELLER: That would be a violation of abusing your position for like personal gain, right?

11 UNDERSHERIFF MCCABE: Yes, sir.

12 WOLFGANG MUELLER: That's one of the rules that you have in your rule book?

13 UNDERSHERIFF MCCABE: Yes.

14 WOLFGANG MUELLER: You take that seriously, do you?

15 UNDERSHERIFF MCCABE: Yes, sir.

16 WOLFGANG MUELLER: The officer drove him to the residence, right?

17 UNDERSHERIFF MCCABE: The West Bloomfield Township Police Officer did, yes sir.

18 WOLFGANG MUELLER: Then he reported a few hours later and was met by your Lieutenant. That
19 would be Clay Jansson. Do you remember that?

20 UNDERSHERIFF MCCABE: Yes, sir.

21 WOLFGANG MUELLER: Who noticed -- and Clay Jansson saw him driving into the parking lot, correct?

22 UNDERSHERIFF MCCABE: I'm not sure about that.

23 WOLFGANG MUELLER: Captain Molinar had been advised already from West Bloomfield of what had
24 happened?

25 UNDERSHERIFF MCCABE: I don't have an independent recollection of that, but if you say so.

1 WOLFGANG MUELLER: Then he reported to work and he smelled of intoxicants and at work he was
2 .14%?

3 UNDERSHERIFF MCCABE: Yes.

4 WOLFGANG MUELLER: He was still -- his work hours, you remember he's a day shift guy?

5 UNDERSHERIFF MCCABE: Yes, sir.

6 WOLFGANG MUELLER: So it was like seven in the morning?

7 UNDERSHERIFF MCCABE: Yes, sir.

8 WOLFGANG MUELLER: Seven in the morning he's still almost twice the legal limit, correct?

9 UNDERSHERIFF MCCABE: Yes, sir.

10 WOLFGANG MUELLER: And he's gotten in trouble two other times he said, right?

11 UNDERSHERIFF MCCABE: Yes, sir.

12 WOLFGANG MUELLER: And you took his work history into account, did you?

13 UNDERSHERIFF MCCABE: I'm sure I did. Yes, sir.

14 WOLFGANG MUELLER: And he wasn't a Sergeant. He was a Deputy?

15 UNDERSHERIFF MCCABE: That's correct.

16 WOLFGANG MUELLER: Now sir, are sworn officers and command officers, if you notice a crime being
17 committed in your presence, are you supposed to do something about it?


18 UNDERSHERIFF MCCABE: Yes, sir

19 WOLFGANG MUELLER: You expect that to happen, right?

20 UNDERSHERIFF MCCABE: Yes, sir.

21 WOLFGANG MUELLER: Are you aware, sir, that Sergeant Clay Jansson from Special Investigations
22 Unit, the Internal Affairs drove him home, got him driven home?

23 UNDERSHERIFF MCCABE: I'm aware of that.

24 WOLFGANG MUELLER: And it wasn't until a half hour later until Captain Molinar told Clay Jansson, you
25 get him over back in here and get him arrested, right?

1 UNDERSHERIFF MCCABE: Yes, but at that time he had made a mistake. That's correct.

2 WOLFGANG MUELLER: And he was arrested?

3 UNDERSHERIFF MCCABE: He was.

4 WOLFGANG MUELLER: And it took Captain Molinar telling the Lieutenant at the time, Clay Jansson, to
5 get him back here and get him arrested?

6 UNDERSHERIFF MCCABE: That is correct.

7 WOLFGANG MUELLER: Because you're not supposed to cut him a break like you did, right?

8 UNDERSHERIFF MCCABE: I don't know what he said to Jansson.

9 WOLFGANG MUELLER: Because driving a person home when he's drunk almost twice the legal limit,
10 that person could have another car and get out on the road and kill somebody, right?

11 UNDERSHERIFF MCCABE: That's correct.

12 WOLFGANG MUELLER: Be a menace to society?

13 UNDERSHERIFF MCCABE: Yes, sir.

14 WOLFGANG MUELLER: Something Lieutenants should know, correct?

15 UNDERSHERIFF MCCABE: Yes.

16 WOLFGANG MUELLER: Something he's expected to know?

17 UNDERSHERIFF MCCABE: Yes, sir.

18 WOLFGANG MUELLER: Something he's trained to know?

19 UNDERSHERIFF MCCABE: Yes, sir.

20 WOLFGANG MUELLER: And what discipline did Clay Jansson get?

21 UNDERSHERIFF MCCABE: He didn't receive any, sir.

#4 WS FF

WS FF

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 5 posts

Posted 25 November 2011 - 10:14 PM

I found some CHILLING articles about Lt. Clay Jansson involving missing evidence and his handling of a SHOOTING/KILLING of a child named Christopher Drypen, by his officers.

It's CHILLING. This guy is F-N nuts

For the past few years, the “CSI” (Crime Scene Investigation) programs have been among the ratings leaders on television. These shows take place in cities like Miami, Las Vegas and New York. Another real-life CSI took place in Highland Michigan, the results of which directly contradict the results of the “official” investigation.

At just before noon on June 22, 2003 (Corpus Christi Sunday), 16 year old Christopher Drypen was gunned down in the lower level of his home by deputies Todd Wood and Arnold Terrell of the Oakland County Sheriff Department (OCSD). Christopher’s parents were present in the house and in the same room as Chris until they were ordered out of the house by the police only minutes before the killing occurred. The timeline of direct observation by the Drypens was uninterrupted until immediately prior to the cold blooded gunning down of the boy.

Immediately after the tragedy the OSCD sealed of the “crime scene” (but nobody was accused of committing a crime). The family members were prohibited from going into their own home. Even the pastor of the family’s Catholic parish was denied entrance to the house to administer last rites or to even offer a final blessing over the boy’s body.

The “official” investigation of the action of the OSCD deputies was conducted by fellow officers of the OCSD. Detective Sgt. Clay Jansson of the OCSD was asked by the family to have the Michigan State Police do the investigation so that it would be done impartially. Jansson refused, telling the Drypens that it is county policy that the department conducts all of its own investigations. When asked “how can you investigate yourself and be impartial?” He replied, without really answering the question: “That is how we do it”. The Drypens asked a neighbor to telephone the Michigan State Police and request their assistance. The post in Northville was contacted and stated that they were unable to assist unless invited to do so by the local authorities. Since the OCSD decided to proceed without any oversight, the State Police were excluded from participation.

The investigation that was done that afternoon was conducted by members of the OCSD crime lab. It is important to note that the OCSD crime lab holds no professional accreditations. The results of their “impartial” investigation drew the conclusion that Wood and Terrell decided that they were in grave peril and shot Chris to death in self defense. This conclusion was given to the Oakland County Prosecutor’s office which ruled that there were insufficient grounds for criminal prosecution against the killing officers. This was exactly opposite to the belief of the parents based upon their first hand observations.

The exoneration of the deputies of any criminal wrongdoing by the prosecutor did not square with the situation as witnessed by the parents. The only way that they could arrive at the truth of what happened was to file a civil lawsuit against the officers and the department. Then, through the discovery process, the truth would come to light.

This is where the “CSI” came into play. A number of professional and certified forensic crime scene specialists were brought in to examine the scene of the killing. The Drypen family did nothing to any of the on-site evidence until these examinations were concluded. This meant that the family had to deal with living in a house riddled with bullet holes and chunks of missing carpeting. It is a good thing too because the evidence told a tale far removed from the prejudiced conclusions drawn by the OCSD.

A number of tests were conducted by the forensic investigators. The paths of each bullet were determined with sensitive laser equipment and each bullet path was traced with string. These “stringings” prove that it was impossible for Todd Wood to have been positioned at the top of the stairs as he demonstrated in photo reenactments and swore to in testimony under oath.

Another test used chemicals to analyze the carpeting and walls of the stairway for any signs of blood. There was no blood to be found on the stairway walls or the carpet of the stairs. The carpet on the bottom two stairs was removed the day of the killing (without permission), so no testing could be done on it.

Photographs taken by members of the OCSD crime lab immediately after the killing show no blood spatters at all on any of the walls of the stairway. Photographs of the blood spatter on the floor at the base of the stairs show circular patterns indicating that they fell straight down off of Chris at that spot. The photographs of the ceiling of the lower level show similar circular blood spatters indicating Chris was gunned down while standing on the floor, not on the stairs as reported by Wood and Terrell.

One of the “CSI” investigators at the Huff Place discovery forensic investigation was a doctor of serology. None of the OCSD investigators came even close to possessing such credentials. In fact, some OSCD investigators were actually taught by the “CSI” serologist.

The blood spatter analysis performed proved extremely insightful. Drops of blood tell the height and angle from which the blood fell. The forensic science of blood spatter analysis says that blood which fell perpendicular to the floor from a distance of 0-2 feet would make a circular drop with slightly frayed edges. Drops from a higher distance would have more pronounced tendrils fraying off the edges (a sunburst pattern). A blood smear on the wall or floor tells the direction of force of the blow. The direction of force is always in the direction towards the tail, or smaller end, of the smear, or splatter. In other words, the largest area of the smear is the point of origin (a wave cast-off pattern). Bloodstain patterns tell a lot about position and movement during the shooting. This destroys most alibi and self-defense arguments and, at the very least, trips most suspects up in their explanation of what happened.

The width and length of a blood spatter can be put into a calculation which results in an angle. This angle determines the direction of the source of the blood spatter. A protractor can be used to illustrate this is 3 dimensions. When this analysis is done for multiple blood spatters in various locations, the directional lines converge at some point in space from which the blood originated. In the case of Christopher Drypen, these lines converged in the lower level of the house, not on the stairs. The “CSI” investigators stated under oath that the evidence conclusively shows that Christopher was not on the stairs when Wood and Terrell fired the 18 rounds into his body.

When confronted with this evidence the OCSD investigators admitted under oath that there was no evidence supporting Christopher being on the stairs as alleged by Wood and Terrell. In fact, it appears that the OCSD investigation the day of the killing was prematurely terminated when the facts began pointing to a conclusion that the investigating authorities did not want reached.
In addition to this team, the scene was also examined by the renowned forensic pathologist Werner Spitz. Dr. Spitz has served on committees investigating the assassinations of President John F. Kennedy and Martin Luther King Jr. He has offered expert testimony in several celebrated cases, including the Preppy Murder Trial in New York, the California Night Stalker case, the wrongful death lawsuit against O.J. Simpson, the case involving Mary Jo Kopechne, who drowned after the car she and Sen. Ted Kennedy were driving in went off a bridge at Chappaquiddick Island, Mass. and most of the high-profile cases in this (Metro Detroit) area. Dr. Spitz examined the scene and declared that based on the position of the deputies and Christopher’s location; there was no justification for the excessive use of force displayed by Wood and Terrell.
The Oakland County Coroner, Dr. L.J. Dracovic determined the cause of death to be homicide. He also called the death an “execution”.
Had it not been for the “CSI – Highland” discovery investigations, the truth as to what really happened would never have been know. The self-serving conclusions of the OCSD investigators would have been accepted as fact. The scientific proof shows the opposite.

Edited by WS FF, 26 November 2011 - 10:04 AM.


#5 WS FF

WS FF

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 5 posts

Posted 25 November 2011 - 10:16 PM

Missing Evidence: A bloody Bullet riddled BIBLE.

One of the most perplexing aspects of Christopher’s death and resulting police investigation is the whereabouts of a particular book … Chris’ Bible.
On the morning of his death, Christopher was in his bedroom reading the Book of Deuteronomy from his Bible. When he left his bedroom and proceeded to the lower level of the house, he had the Bible with him. The whole time that his parents were with him, even in the presence of the first two police officers, Christopher carried his Bible. It was only a few minutes between the last time his parents saw him alive with the Bible to when he was executed in cold blood by Wood and Terrell.
After the killing and the subsequent department “investigation” (from which Chris’ parents were denied access) the Bible mysteriously disappeared. During the investigation, members of the OCSD investigating team took material away from the house in many opaque black plastic bags. When asked by the family what they were removing, OCSD representative Detective Sgt. Clay Jansson replied “we’ll give you a list before we leave”. That was a lie. No list was provided until it was demanded from the OCSD as part of the discovery process for the civil suit. This took many months. The department was not cooperative and was not going to make anything easy.
Guess what? Chris’ Bible never showed up on a list of articles that the OCSD removed from the house and it was never located. Bibles do not simply vanish into thin air and it is known that Chris has his in his personal possession only minutes before he died. It is the firm belief of the family that Chris was holding the Bible when he was shot and that the Bible was likely riddled with bullet holes and blood from the insane number of gunshot rounds that were fired into Chris. It would not look good for the OCSD deputies to have gunned down a minor, in his own home, on a sunny Corpus Christi Sunday morning while he was carrying a Bible … so the Bible conveniently disappeared.
It is also odd that the OCSD denied the local Catholic pastor access to the boy’s body to say a blessing. Fr. Leo was forced to remain outside the house in the yard and perform the blessing “from afar”.
To this day the Bible has never been found. The Mystery of the Bible remains unsolved.

Edited by WS FF, 25 November 2011 - 10:19 PM.


#6 solabeirtan

solabeirtan

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,254 posts

Posted 26 November 2011 - 05:27 AM

While none of us would condone what goes on with OC Law enforcement activities, especially anything close to what is described here.

This final detail is out of place here as Corpus Cristi is not an OC suburb, as far as I know.

"It would not look good for the OCSD deputies to have gunned down a minor, in his own home, on a sunny Corpus Christi Sunday morning while he was carrying a Bible... " -WS FF _Posted Today, 03:16 AM

"At just before noon on June 22, 2003 (Corpus Christi Sunday), ..." -WS FF _Posted Today, 03:14 AM

... otherwise I would conclude also that it was cold blooded murder.



ps. My bad and I stand corrected. Corpus Cristi is a Religous celebration commemorating the last supper. It was celebrated on Thursday June 19 in 2003. However this article stated Corpus Cristi Sunday which would have been the following Sunday June 22, 2003 .
Also Corpus Cristi, Texas, was named after this Holy Day. In 1519, on the day of Corpus Christi, Spanish explorer Alonzo Alvarez de Pineda discovered a lush semi-tropical bay on what is now the southern coast of Texas. The bay, and the city that later grew in that area, took the name of the feast day.

Edited by solabeirtan, 26 November 2011 - 10:44 AM.


#7 lawyercaregiver

lawyercaregiver

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 621 posts
  • LocationCyberspace Michigan

Posted 24 December 2011 - 10:30 PM

View PostCrane, on 30 March 2011 - 09:53 PM, said:

Can any attorneys shed light on this. What could potentially happen?

According to the Oakland Press, Clay Jansson is the Marijuana Facility Checker of Commerce Township. http://www.theoaklan....txt?viewmode=3


I can surely shed some light and the answer is simple. It is the job of the police to protect, serve, plant evidence, and lie to protect the State's case whenever they wish.

I have said it or years- we live in a Fascist police state.....

#8 peanutbutter

peanutbutter

    Advanced Member

  • True Warrior
  • PipPipPip
  • 5,470 posts
  • LocationDexter

Posted 25 December 2011 - 09:37 AM

View PostCraven, on 30 March 2011 - 02:25 PM, said:

The Breakdown: Sgt Clay Jansson reportedly had a realtionship with a Julie Krohta, who went through a bitter divorce with her husband Richard Whitemore. Richard Whitmore received legal custody of the kids. The Knight in Shining armor, Sgt. Clay R Jansson, to the rescue. Richards ex wife reports that he husband was drinking alcohol. Sgt. Clay R. Jansson conducts and emergency hearing and has the children removed from the home. Surpise, Sgt Clay R Jansson lost evidence which could have exonerated Richard Whitmore.

Clay Jansson, knowing his dirtiness would be exposed, later dismisses the case at court.

Keep this in mind. Sgt Clay R Jansson, UNDER OATH IN FEDERAL COURT, denied that he knew Julie Krohta? The Citizen affadavit below, indicates Julie Knew Sgt Clay R Jansson, Dated Him and wanted to marry him. How did Sgt. Clay R Jansson get away with this?

Citizen Affadavit: https://docs.google....wYTNkNGQ3&hl=en

Testimony Under Oath: https://docs.google....xYmNkMGE2&hl=en

Citizen Complaint: https://docs.google....2NzBkMTk0&hl=en

Well .. Craven .. nice first post ..

See you a lot in the comments in the papers.

#9 stlhdr

stlhdr

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 85 posts

Posted 24 January 2012 - 10:44 PM

Oakland county has a very scary sheriff's department.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users