Using Molasses With Hydro
#1
Posted 17 August 2011 - 01:48 PM
#2
Posted 17 August 2011 - 01:54 PM
Welcome Meangreen222!![media]



#3
Posted 17 August 2011 - 03:00 PM
#4
Posted 17 August 2011 - 03:43 PM
Why did you put sugar in the water?
I added it trying to add density to the flowers. And thanks for the welcome
#5
Posted 17 August 2011 - 05:08 PM
i have two thoughts on this. the first is that even organic black strap molasses does not get broken down in DWC the same way it is in soil. for that reason, it is not advisable. There are specific products out there to add sugars to your plants. Bud Candy is on popular one, but i have never used that.
My second thought is that foam tend to occur in DWC when more biological agents are present. My hunch is that the molasses has caused this, as there are bacteria in the molasses that could cause this. in itself, this isn't anything to worry too much about. But i think taking molasses out of your dwc grow would be better for it in those ways, losing the foam and not adding things that cannot be taken up by the plant immediately.
Happy growing, and remember to take everything you hear here balanced against the common wisdom, basic biology, and your knowledge of your genetics in the plants, as well as the area they live in!
#6
Posted 17 August 2011 - 05:11 PM
#7
Posted 17 August 2011 - 06:57 PM
You want answers or love?I added it trying to add density to the flowers. And thanks for the welcome
Don't put that in there, just the regular nutes, no other mumbo-jumbo.
I've heard molasses is supposed to make the weed taste better if used in the last weeks of flowering, I would think sugar would dissolve better and still give the same result. If it does effect the taste at all.
Decent genetics, not to much stretching and plenty of light, give firm nugs, the last being the most important.
Edited by bob boberson, 17 August 2011 - 06:58 PM.
#8
Posted 17 August 2011 - 08:38 PM
#9
Posted 17 August 2011 - 09:02 PM
#10
Posted 18 August 2011 - 10:43 AM
Frankly, molasses is a just a crutch for bad growing practices, makes most meds "generic", and contributes to poor combustion. I generally find it to be a marker for poor inherent quality.
#11
Posted 18 August 2011 - 12:19 PM
#12
Posted 18 August 2011 - 05:43 PM



#13
Posted 20 August 2011 - 09:15 PM
#14
Posted 20 August 2011 - 11:33 PM
Keep us updated.
I will. It's interesting to see these plants side by side. I know much more about how we use sugars to generate ATP, which is the energy that we use. It's a metabolic process of respiration. But plants use transpairation, and that's really different. I'll tell you what I see. The plants without molasses are building typical buds. Airy buds, like I'm used to seeing. Nice big full colas, which start nine or ten inches below the tip. Based on my experience, they'll fill up nicely and produce some beautiful tall buds. The plant that got molasses at four weeks is distinctly different. The buds are stacking in the nine to ten inch range, but they are staying separate. Instead of a really large airy cola, they are producing large dense nuggets. The calixes seem to be exploding from them. I know that the plant uses the energy from the light, along with the nutrients, to produce the sugar necessary for growth. I'm hypothesizing here, but by dumb luck I might have provided them with sugar at just the right time to promote individual bud development. I gave them another shot of molasse this week, so it was 5ml into six gallons of nutes at four weeks, and 5ml again at eight weeks. Don't know if I'll do it again, but I've definitely got more density in the plant that got molasses. The foliar development looks better also. Trichomes look almost identical at eight weeks, but the nuggets look heavier. And I have to admit that I'm having fun!
#15
Posted 21 August 2011 - 12:20 AM
#16
Posted 23 August 2011 - 03:06 PM
I will. It's interesting to see these plants side by side. I know much more about how we use sugars to generate ATP, which is the energy that we use. It's a metabolic process of respiration. But plants use transpairation, and that's really different. I'll tell you what I see. The plants without molasses are building typical buds. Airy buds, like I'm used to seeing. Nice big full colas, which start nine or ten inches below the tip. Based on my experience, they'll fill up nicely and produce some beautiful tall buds. The plant that got molasses at four weeks is distinctly different. The buds are stacking in the nine to ten inch range, but they are staying separate. Instead of a really large airy cola, they are producing large dense nuggets. The calixes seem to be exploding from them. I know that the plant uses the energy from the light, along with the nutrients, to produce the sugar necessary for growth. I'm hypothesizing here, but by dumb luck I might have provided them with sugar at just the right time to promote individual bud development. I gave them another shot of molasse this week, so it was 5ml into six gallons of nutes at four weeks, and 5ml again at eight weeks. Don't know if I'll do it again, but I've definitely got more density in the plant that got molasses. The foliar development looks better also. Trichomes look almost identical at eight weeks, but the nuggets look heavier. And I have to admit that I'm having fun!
What you're reporting is the type of thing I had read about and was trying to recreate, but I notice that you were using much less molasses than I was. I had read that you want to use one tsp per gallon, which is around 5 times what you used, that could have been part of the problem I'd imagine. Also, I still don't think the foam had anything to do with any type of growth, if it was a growth it seems like it would have kept growing after I changed the water, instead what happened was that the foam simply melted into the new water and disappeared.
#17
Posted 24 August 2011 - 12:11 PM
#18
Posted 27 August 2011 - 11:22 PM
So... Do we have an official verdict on molasses?
Not an official verdict, but I'll tell you what I see. Side by side comparison. OGKush, nine and a half weeks in flower from the same mother. The plant that got molasses is still building seperated buds. They're dense! The plant without molasses is building colas, stacked up colas that are approaching a foot tall. It really is interesting to see the difference from giving them some readily available sugar. The seperate buds are more dense. Trichomes on both plants are just getting cloudy. Maybe a hint of amber here and there. It'll be interesting to see the difference in mass. I'm gonna go into flush soon, and I'll keep you posted. The colas without molasses are heavier. I know that because I've had to truss them up. But maybe the branches got stronger on the plant with the molasses bump.The no-molasses plant is getting so heavy that they flopped. I'm gonna try this again with more molasses next time. It's fun to play around a bit. I'll give you a smokeability report in a few weeks.
#19
Posted 28 August 2011 - 04:33 AM
Not an official verdict, but I'll tell you what I see. Side by side comparison. OGKush, nine and a half weeks in flower from the same mother. The plant that got molasses is still building seperated buds. They're dense! The plant without molasses is building colas, stacked up colas that are approaching a foot tall. It really is interesting to see the difference from giving them some readily available sugar. The seperate buds are more dense. Trichomes on both plants are just getting cloudy. Maybe a hint of amber here and there. It'll be interesting to see the difference in mass. I'm gonna go into flush soon, and I'll keep you posted. The colas without molasses are heavier. I know that because I've had to truss them up. But maybe the branches got stronger on the plant with the molasses bump.The no-molasses plant is getting so heavy that they flopped. I'm gonna try this again with more molasses next time. It's fun to play around a bit. I'll give you a smokeability report in a few weeks.
Thanks again for the information, it is much appreciated.
#20
Posted 28 August 2011 - 11:44 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users














