Is It Nothing Over Card Limits (2.5 Oz Of Brownie) Or No Brownie Ever?

[Restorium2]

Jumping to conclusions.

Logic;

There's an international situation involving marijuana and a raid followed. Husband shows up at said raid and has marijuana on him. He is now part of the investigation.

 

Since the poster is saying that 'they had worked together before' leads one to believe that he might have already been on the radar. Phone records and video capture might be used in the investigation.

[Restorium2]

Yes, I see it, but I doubt what you are saying and you don't have enough information to tell.

It's a 'no brainer' that 'he became' part of the investigation. Whether or not he was before he showed up at the raid will never be known, but it's a definite possibility to consider.

[Restorium2]

This is why people shouldn't discuss their cases on internet forums.

Exactly. Edit away if you think you should.

[jointedone]

Why didn't he just eat them?  Tried and true method since I was a kid. Ate the bag too.

[Mtrue101]

.

Edited March 19, 2014 by Mtrue101

[trichcycler]

the truffles may have been simple sweets, had the joint not been produced/transported illegally.  I'm guessing they want the bigger fish, and will drop the little ones, assuming their is NO connection except a once in a couple years visit, which could have been a wrong address turn driveway turn around ?  Have the police established a relationship between your man and the raided house/occupants?

[t-pain]

yeah guys you might want to stop jumping and tut-tutting / finger wagging and 'i told you so-ing' on people who are looking for help.

[Wild Bill]

Why didn't he just eat them?  Tried and true method since I was a kid. Ate the bag too.

 

Trying to eat the evidence didn't help Malice Green.

[ozzrokk]

This is the damage that the carruthers decision is causing. It has got to stop......... Sorry to hear of your troubles....... This should be an illegal transport at best and some would even argue that for a patient.

[trichcycler]

"I thought this forum was here to discuss things like this. We just don't know where to turn and are trying to gather information " is a response to zap's suggestion of not discussing too much in a forum. The best help available here has been offered. "Get competent legal council".  Dissecting the incident and commenting on ways others could possibly avoid the same issues is very helpful and should continue, even if its redundant and hurts a feeling. People are going to jail for their silly oversights, and our Act is threatened by the courts handling of some. Even today some miss the most obvious safety precautions, maybe because nobody took the time to explore them beforehand? imo

yeah guys you might want to stop jumping and tut-tutting / finger wagging and 'i told you so-ing' on people who are looking for help.

[Thai1]

.

Edited March 19, 2014 by Thai1

[Thai1]

.

Edited March 19, 2014 by Thai1

[t-pain]

then it will be your evidence/testimony that will be entered into the court record, and they will have to disprove it...

 

recording? i think they can record you at any time in the jail/copcar/etc. as long as you are in 'public' or they think they can trick you...

[Thai1]

.

Edited March 19, 2014 by Thai1

[trichcycler]

and own guns, run for office,work anywhere, travel abroad

If someone was to take a 7411 can they still vote?

Edited March 17, 2014 by grassmatch

[MiMedical]

In Michigan yes, even if you have a felony, you can vote in Michigan, you can not vote if you're incarcerated.

[trichcycler]

I heard they were gonna put all those bad first time drug offender 7411 people on an island, but I haven't seen it yet !

[Thai1]

.

Edited March 19, 2014 by Thai1