Jump to content

Az Supreme Court Will Hear Cases About Medical Marijuana Use For People On Probation


bobandtorey

Recommended Posts

The Arizona Supreme Court will hear two cases about medical marijuana next year. The threshold question in both is if people on probation can use the drug.

The Medical Marijuana Act passed by popular vote in Arizona in 2010. It allows citizens with certain conditions to use the drug. This law has been controversial and is now being challenged in the Court of Appeals. Pima County Public Defender David Euchner is involved with the probation cases. He said people on probation have some of their freedoms restricted with curfews and limits on alcohol, but medical marijuana is different.

“There are provisions within the Medical Marijuana Act that say that government cannot deny any right or privilege," Euchner said. "Even though probation isn’t a right, it’s a privilege, it’s still something that cannot be denied based in medical marijuana it's right there in the letter of the law.”

Euchner said the Supreme Court’s decision will hopefully settle disputes on the issue once and for all. The case is expected to be heard next year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MSC has been bad in

1. patient 2 patient transfers

2. an mmma violation means a public health code violations

3. defining "possession" from the PHC - against their own instructions to use plain meanings of words in ballot initiated laws

4. not hearing carruthers/concentrates -- did you guys file for reconsideration asking them to rule on concentrates only?

5. sending cases back down to COA (hartwick) instead of just skipping the COA, after the COA rejected it the first time.

 

theres probably more. sure MSC could be worse, but they arent doing us many favors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MSC has been bad in

1. patient 2 patient transfers

2. an mmma violation means a public health code violations

3. defining "possession" from the PHC - against their own instructions to use plain meanings of words in ballot initiated laws

4. not hearing carruthers/concentrates -- did you guys file for reconsideration asking them to rule on concentrates only?

5. sending cases back down to COA (hartwick) instead of just skipping the COA, after the COA rejected it the first time.

 

theres probably more. sure MSC could be worse, but they arent doing us many favors.

 

Thank you , I stand corrected . 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MSC has been bad in

1. patient 2 patient transfers

2. an mmma violation means a public health code violations

3. defining "possession" from the PHC - against their own instructions to use plain meanings of words in ballot initiated laws

4. not hearing carruthers/concentrates -- did you guys file for reconsideration asking them to rule on concentrates only?

5. sending cases back down to COA (hartwick) instead of just skipping the COA, after the COA rejected it the first time.

 

theres probably more. sure MSC could be worse, but they arent doing us many favors.

May i also add they our sick of hearing  MMJ case's

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...