Jump to content

Family Charged In Decker Marijuana Bust


Recommended Posts

Family members charged in marijuana bust

 

 

 

 

DECKER — Three family members have been arraigned in last fall’s drug bust in which several hundred pounds of marijuana were seized.

 

Preliminary exams in 73rd District Court are tentatively set for Feb. 9 for Laura, Jason and Michael Peters of Decker.

 

 

 

Members of the Sanilac County Drug Task Force raided their residence in the 2000 block of Lamton Road on Oct. 27, seizing more than 355 pounds of dried marijuana plants and plant remnants, and 10 ½ pounds of processed marijuana stored in totes, boxes, jars and shelves throughout the house and out-buildings.

 

Laura Marie Peters, 19, is charged with three counts: delivery-manufacture 45 kilograms of marijuana; maintaining a drug house; and possession of marijuana. Bond was set at $2,500 personal recognizance.

 

Jason John Peters, 45, is charged with five counts: two counts of possession of con- trolled substance — second offense; two counts of maintaining a drug house — second offense; and possession of marijuana — second offense. Bond was set at $2,500 personal recognizance.

 

 

 

 

Michael David Peters, 67, is charged with five counts: delivery manufacture 45 kilograms of marijuana; delivery-manufacture five to 45 kilograms of marijuana; two counts of maintaining a drug house; and possession of marijuana.

 

Michael and Jason Peters are father and son, respectively, while Laura Peters is a granddaughter, according to Drug Task Force Director Jim Johnson. http://sanilaccountynews.mihomepaper.com/news/2016-02-03/Front_Page/Family_members_charged_in_marijuana_bust.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

carded or not, if known?

since no pics are taken during the usual raid, the meaning of 'remnants' is open.

also, open is the question of usable/unusable.  raid squads (generally) take no pics.  thus when unusable is found on dry racks it is not checked for moisture content, but is matter of fact, charged as all usable even when wet and won't burn.  

the law nit picks detail, the enforcers do not and treat all the same unless you have images which makes their assertions fact-checkable at a peripheral site off-site.   Generally raid squads see raids as a shot at promotion--as long as a convictions obtained. Non-convictions are seen as a wasted opportunity, a misfire, a defeat.  Promotions, like cash are sought.  Convictions are always bonus-eligible.  To speak up and note in a report that anything found unusable is a certain reprimand.  

And shittiestedly, f planned-parenthood type videos were done of raid squad leaders--they'd all get a raise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...