Is Anyone Aware Of A Precedent For Clones Within The Last 6 Months?

[pic book]

The story goes that a MI MMMP patient was prosecuted for possessing 3,000 cuts, most of them rootless AND he was not convicted due to no THC found in the cuts?  There were no buds in his grow? Supposedly this court decision means there's no penalty for cuts.

 

It sounds bogus to me.   However peeps are changing to selling only clones as they are the only safe things to possess.  And there is no limit to the number of cuts one can hold.

 

The guy who told me says that attorney Paul Stokely represented the defendant.

[t-pain]

doesnt sound accurate, marijuana means any part of the plant growing or not.

 

they charge you with marijuana, not with thc. thc only comes if synthetics.

 

the tests are for thc, but the plant itself is illegal.

 

 

the only way to get around this would be possession of hemp plants. but people dont grow hemp legally either so i have doubts.

[t-pain]

http://legislature.mi.gov/doc.aspx?mcl-333-7106

 

(2) "Industrial hemp" means the plant Cannabis sativa L. and any part of the plant, whether growing or not, with a delta-9-tetrahydrocannibinol concentration of not more than 0.3% on a dry weight basis.

 

(4) "Marihuana" means all parts of the plant Cannabis sativa L., growing or not; the seeds of that plant; the resin extracted from any part of the plant; and every compound, manufacture, salt, derivative, mixture, or preparation of the plant or its seeds or resin. Marihuana does not include the mature stalks of the plant, fiber produced from the stalks, oil or cake made from the seeds of the plant, any other compound, manufacture, salt, derivative, mixture, or preparation of the mature stalks, except the resin extracted from those stalks, fiber, oil, or cake, or any sterilized seed of the plant that is incapable of germination. Marihuana does not include industrial hemp grown or cultivated, or both, for research purposes under the industrial hemp research act.

 

 

you know what? maybe it would be considered industrial hemp if there was not much thc in the cuts......

 

wow

[t-pain]

my advice would be to try to contact that lawyer for more info

 

i cant find him in the googles.

[trichcycler]

 

 

you know what? maybe it would be considered industrial hemp if there was not much thc in the cuts......

 

wow

 

 

Crappy medical cannabis growers rejoice!!!!!!   " no man really, this smoke sucks, try it....seee, you cant arrest me I dont even know what I'm doing"  

 

 

My attorney told me that leo could and likely would count cuttings as they would any other wet drying cannabis given a situation like a raid, while searching for evidence.  I was concerned specifically about my preserved cuttings in stasis. They dont grow, they have no roots, and no thc, no dirt, test tubes and jello is all

[trichcycler]

The story goes that a MI MMMP patient was prosecuted for possessing 3,000 cuts, most of them rootless AND he was not convicted due to no THC found in the cuts?  There were no buds in his grow? Supposedly this court decision means there's no penalty for cuts.

 

It sounds bogus to me.   However peeps are changing to selling only clones as they are the only safe things to possess.  And there is no limit to the number of cuts one can hold.

 

The guy who told me says that attorney Paul Stokely represented the defendant.

prosecuted for 3000 cannabis plants found by leo?

courts conducted drug tests on his clones?  using what tests?

 

 there should be a link to the arrest and case, either news or court? 

 

https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=Paul+Stokely+michigan+attorney doesnt show this guy as an attorney? 

Edited July 26, 2016 by grassmatch

[bax]

The majority of the 20,000 marijuana arrests each year in Michigan do not get any kind of press.

Edited July 26, 2016 by bax

[+Malamute]

Intent.

[trichcycler]

The majority of the 20,000 marijuana arrests each year in Michigan do not get any kind of press.

touche

 

and google does show all attorneys in Mi, and I cant find this one...anyone?

[bax]

pic book has amazing sources, but possibly he didnt get the lawyer name correct spelling.

[trichcycler]

 

 

It sounds bogus to me.   .

and some times incredibly intuitive

[pic book]

i sent my source a request for the correct spelling.

[Wild Bill]

As accurate as most cops are it wouldn't surprise me if they were tomato plants that an officer recognized as being dangerous marihuana plants using his finely tuned investigative skills and years of experience.

[t-pain]

usually 3000 tomato plants don't make it to court and require no lawyer though