Jump to content

176 Shocking Things Donald Trump Has Done This Election


zachw

Recommended Posts

nypost, Washington times and dailymail aren't really the best factual newspapers.

 

in this case of leaked emails, msn, cnn, ap, reuters, huffpo and other media have stopped reporting on the emails. so it's hard to find an unbiased report.

 

zap claims of Russia hacking are false. there is absolutely no evidence to back that up. Sounds like colin powell and his bs wmd in iraq. where is hans blix when you need him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if you want, I can post a bunch of links to the emails. remind me.

 

 

although from what I've read so far in the emails themselves, there's a lot of nothing and whining. some people trying to make Clinton look good against Bernie attacks etc.

 

still, some interesting stuff. Clinton trying to distance herself from the foundation. some wall street speech drafts are also in there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

nypost, Washington times and dailymail aren't really the best factual newspapers.

 

in this case of leaked emails, msn, cnn, ap, reuters, huffpo and other media have stopped reporting on the emails. so it's hard to find an unbiased report.

 

zap claims of Russia hacking are false. there is absolutely no evidence to back that up. Sounds like colin powell and his bs wmd in iraq. where is hans blix when you need him?

The U.S. Intelligence Community (USIC) is confident that the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of e-mails from US persons and institutions, including from US political organizations.

 

 

 

https://www.dni.gov/index.php/newsroom/press-releases/215-press-releases-2016/1423-joint-dhs-odni-election-security-statement

Edited by Restorium2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd suggest you (I don't mean anyone in particular, so don't get all crazy, ya crazies!) read some of glenn Greenwald's (he reports equally negatively on both, because thats yhe truth) stuff at the intercept. He is far more credible than any of you guys, any one in corporate media, and of course much more reliable than the campaigns. I don't condone one thing trump has done, but if you really lack the ability to question your own candidate (killary)....I'd ask you not to vote. I understand the hard-line that has to be taken in speaking with a trump supporter, but get real. Get off of cnn and Facebook for news. The ap sucks at this point. Are you all getting dem news from donna brazile???? Truthfully, I don't give a flower about either. I pay a higher tax rate than both the rich muffin makers, and for that, they can suck it.

 

Wet

Edited by WET
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm with t-pain here. I'm not voting for war, I'm not voting for fracking. The environment is the single biggest issue of our time and it was mentioned once in passing at the last debate. Champion of fracking globally....nah, not for me. I agree with you on everything about trumo, zap. Don't get me wrong. I'm a youngster in terms of this program, so Snowden is a hero to my generation, Wikileaks is powerful to my generation, Greenwald is the news to my generation. We love anonymous. We love grass fed everything. We hate oil, we hate war. I'm actually darn proud of it

Edited by WET
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm with t-pain here. I'm not voting for war, I'm not voting for fracking. The environment is the single biggest issue of our time and it was mentioned once in passing at the last debate. Champion of fracking globally....nah, not for me. I agree with you on everything about trumo, zap. Don't get me wrong. I'm a youngster in terms of this program, so Snowden is a hero to my generation, Wikileaks is powerful to my generation, Greenwald is the news to my generation. We love anonymous. We love grass fed everything. We hate oil, we hate war. I'm actually darn proud of it

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump is considering nominating Oklahoma oil and gas fracking mogul Harold Hamm as energy secretary if elected to the White House.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump is considering nominating Oklahoma oil and gas fracking mogul Harold Hamm as energy secretary if elected to the White House.

this pisses me straight of. A cowardly clinton approach. Oh, don't like me....you're a trumper!!!! The donald has nothing to do with jill stein. Thanks for the laugh tho. I didn't see any candidate but jill stein stand with the people in opposition of the Dakota pipeline. Get real
Link to comment
Share on other sites

this pisses me straight of. A cowardly clinton approach. Oh, don't like me....you're a trumper!!!! The donald has nothing to do with jill stein. Thanks for the laugh tho. I didn't see any candidate but jill stein stand with the people in opposition of the Dakota pipeline. Get real

A Jill Stein vote would be a protest vote that does nothing for the environment. Zero. And it could put the chief of fracking in the white house, be real. If the environment is truly important to you then don't turn your back on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you are saying you paid 33%? That would mean you had zero deductions. No one has zero deductions. You get a deduction for being alive. Keep it real. You didn't pay 33%.

investments restorium. They get taxed much higher. Cg tax and such. Don't be a dick, man. Sorry I talked bad about your girl.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A Jill Stein vote would be a protest vote that does nothing for the environment. Zero. And it could put the chief of fracking in the white house, be real. If the environment is truly important to you then don't turn your back on it.

not if she gets 5% and federal funding. I'm not that narrow minded like the masses.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

investments restorium. They get taxed much higher. Cg tax and such. Don't be a dick, man. Sorry I talked bad about your girl.

I have lots of investments and I pay taxes. I do my own taxes. I know something about taxes and would be willing to bet you don't pay 33% unless you are a terrible investor that just plain want to throw money away. You are not making any sense. Be real and I will agree with you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jill Stein may be a good candidate, but cannot even beat Gary Johnson, let alone Trump. I'm sorry for saying it, but the rest of her policies are not quite as put together as the ones I support. I don't think it is smart for Jill Stein or her supporters to undermine Clinton in this race, given the reality of the electoral college.

I agree with that. Thanks for a real conversation. It seems my tax return is now in the spotlight. The anti-vaxxer stuff is bad, and there are a few ideas that aren't realistic. I get it. I'm just saying to look at the intercept. I won't be releasing my tax returns, I won't be voting for trump or clinton, and I want be responsible ding to this thread anymore. Sorry to restorium, did not mean to offend him by voting my conscience. Moral of the story....vote, vote, vote....unless it's not for my guy....then flower you! Yup, j suspect my day gets better from here.

 

Wet

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with that. Thanks for a real conversation. It seems my tax return is now in the spotlight. The anti-vaxxer stuff is bad, and there are a few ideas that aren't realistic. I get it. I'm just saying to look at the intercept. I won't be releasing my tax returns, I won't be voting for trump or clinton, and I want be responsible ding to this thread anymore. Sorry to restorium, did not mean to offend him by voting my conscience. Moral of the story....vote, vote, vote....unless it's not for my guy....then flower you! Yup, j suspect my day gets better from here.

 

Wet

What is in the spotlight is real tax information from someone who knows because they make tax decisions daily. Not a fake like Trump who hires a tax specialist to do his taxes and doesn't know anything about it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Respectfully, you still are not making any sense. Please slow down and quit with the BS.

respectfully, check the fec. A party that gets 5% of the vote gets federal campaign funding the next cycle. O though previously that you were the source of good information. I hope that's true, but right now you are stirring a bowl of shite. Again, sorry you are butthurt read some glenn Greenwald and relax.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...