# Of Caregivers Per Address

[frosty@frosty]

Trying to find information on this subject. Anyone have any solid legal information on the limitations of amount of caregivers per address? Thanks in advance.

[trichcycler]

nope, law makes no mention of such scenario's but be careful, I've personally seen this go very badly. For once those plants must be separated and everyone on their own side, no access otherwise. make sure to love those growing at the same address, and that they love you too, with all of their hearts.

Edited October 26, 2016 by trichcycler

[bax]

no law about caregivers in the same address.

 

but, you cannot access or possess any plants that arent yours or your patients.

 

there was a case where 3 caregivers grew together in the same room without any access barriers to each others plants, and they had to each explain why they had 88 plants.

 

also, federal law gets extended penalties when its over 99 plants. so stay under 99.

[frosty@frosty]

Thank you for the information. the facility where we plan to conduct our business would have separate growing areas with locked entry to each caregiver's area. Stay under 99 plants, noted. Thanks!

[frosty@frosty]

I have also been notified by other individuals that patients/caregivers are allowed a maximum of 12 plants in the flowering stage, however I cannot find any information on this specifically. Any information on the limitation of maximum allotted number of plants in the flowering stage per address/cg/or patient?

[AmishRnot4ganja]

Each patient can have 12 plants regardless of what growth stage they are in.

[Highlander]

I have also been notified by other individuals that patients/caregivers are allowed a maximum of 12 plants in the flowering stage, however I cannot find any information on this specifically. Any information on the limitation of maximum allotted number of plants in the flowering stage per address/cg/or patient?

Someone gave you bad information

[frosty@frosty]

Thanks guys, after researching I couldn't find anything backing those statements. Appreciate the reassurance!

[+Malamute]

No one mentioned it, but there may be issues with constructive possession.

 

I am sorry but I don't want to type it all out, but hopefully someone can explain it for you and why putting multiple cg's in the same residence isn't necessarily a great idea, although not necessarily illegal at the state level.

[bax]

right, if the building is owned by one person, sometimes the feds charge that person with all the plants...

[pergamum362]

Its usually a bad idea, but you should Also take into account the level of each independent op. I would not want fo be associated with a location in which you have say, 3 full house caregivers operating at max..no way, no how..nope period.

[pergamum362]

Now 3, with say 2 patients each..eh..in a warehouse setting, with hard walled barries, like office spaces...maybe. Still, probably a bad idea.

[trichcycler]

Its usually a bad idea, but you should Also take into account the level of each independent op. I would not want fo be associated with a location in which you have say, 3 full house caregivers operating at max..no way, no how..nope period.

rented wharehouse, growers "heard" some rules to follow, multiple growers with little idea of the law, blind leading the blind.......not a good idea at all imo.  grow ops have not historically worked out in our MI history so far.   (plus, guaranteed at least one of the multiple growers will be plagued with mites, then so shall you....be careful

 

I would secure a private garden space, could be as small as a tent in a closet, tell nobody of your intentions, and enjoy your own medicine. When you get really good at cultivation then accept a well known dear to you patient to assist.

[imiubu]

Constructive Possession Law & Legal Definition

 

 

 

“The possession is called constructive possession when a person does not have the direct and physical control over the substances but can knowingly control it and intends to control it, sometimes through another person.” United States v. Herder, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 2812 (4th Cir. Va. Feb. 11, 2010).

 

http://definitions.uslegal.com/c/constructive-possession/

[bennybuttstinker]

didnt the coa rule on co-ops?-

 

they did. close relatives, i.e. wife, brother, father, son, etc. are allowed to co-op.

read back. it's in there somewhere.

 

otherwise it has to be separate tax parcels.

Edited October 27, 2016 by bennybuttstinker

[trichcycler]

didnt the coa rule on co-ops?-

 

they did. close relatives, i.e. wife, brother, father, son, etc. are allowed to co-op.

read back. it's in there somewhere.

 

otherwise it has to be separate tax parcels.

you know the score......links please??

[imiubu]

didnt the coa rule on co-ops?-

 

they did. close relatives, i.e. wife, brother, father, son, etc. are allowed to co-op.

read back. it's in there somewhere.

 

otherwise it has to be separate tax parcels.

 

Welcome to the 3MA

[musicjock]

I was told  two growers in the same place is ok, but each person must have a locked door to their respective patient plants.