People V King

[Kingpinn]

.

 

 

[Kingpinn]

.

 

 

[Kingpinn]

.

 

 

[1337Gr33n]

KingPinn, so sorry you are getting dragged through this. Eric, you are a hero among heroes. Thank you for all of the very hard work and long hours that you put in for the people.

[thanks2]

Looking forward to hearing how you are doing Kingpin. It is very disappointing they will not allow this to be taped.

[Kingpinn]

.

 

 

[bobandtorey]

11 days now at least they are thinking more then i can say for are Judge

[puffaway]

This is an extraordinary writ that is rarely granted. I am not sure I have ever seen a request of the Supreme Court to hold the Court of Appeals in contempt.

 

I certainly hope you have competent legal counsel. Even if you are a lawyer (and I suspect as much based on your work and posts) that does not mean you are qualified to do appellate work much less practice before the State Supreme Court. I practiced for at least 10 years and handled at least 20 appeals (a couple of them even successful ) and I would not have touched this (for less than $6,000.00 up front ) and with a full understanding from the client that I was going to be getting help on this one!

Thank you very much for your postings on this site. Your legal opinions help many of us to get back to "the middle" of these issues and get a better understanding of the reality of how our legal system works and why.

 

Obviously I have the same prayers for Eric as everyone else. Our system is definately flawed, and hopefully some case law will come out of this that will clarify it. I'd rather see case law defining this statute than having our legislature rewrite it. What a shame is takes such a personal and financial toll to get that far. It just is not right....

[Eric L. VanDussen]

[+RevThad]

Keep up the great work, and if there is ever anything I personally can do to lend a hand, feel free to ask.

 

Thank you for all that you do.

[Kingpinn]

.

 

 

[Bisharoo]

Kingpinn, we are waiting with you in our own small, maybe insignificant way, but you should know that many are watching what these courts do with great interest and trepidation. Best thoughts your way...

 

[lawyercaregiver]

They still haven't set oral arguments?

 

On the seat for this one.

 

How you holding up Larry? Litigation is nothing but a horrible nightmare (and that's when you win).

[Kingpinn]

.

 

 

[bobandtorey]

We all are Waiting too i will be inn court for someone else today in Oakland county of Croce

[kruztydj]

I know ALOT about workers comp so if ya have questions I can help. Took me 3 years just to see the judge. As ya found out they got rid of the judges so the back log is ugly..

[Kingpinn]

.

 

 

[Guest knucklehead bob]

W T F ? Is there no time limit on such things ?

[bobandtorey]

W T F ? Is there no time limit on such things ?

 

Am no Lawyer but i play one on here i think their is no time limit

[Kingpinn]

.

 

 

[Kingpinn]

.

 

 

[bobandtorey]

hey KP you should call inn to the MMMA radio show this Wednesday and ask him

[trix]

Wow, Thank you for sharing this KingPin, Eric

 

I can see why they don't want to allow, cause they know they blew this one...

Kinda how I feel in my case as well, they are gonna look stupid when the public see what our courts are wasting their time and money on!!

 

Good luck my friend I see a bright outcome on your case.. I would love to attend your hearing but you are FAR and I'm BROKE, I'm fighting a battle myself.

I know the way you feel when you stated you feel like your not shown the love and consideration you deserve.. But just look at how many people on here follow these posts the love is there, the money may not be, but I for sure will pray for you and best wishes with your outcome!!

 

Trix

[Eric L. VanDussen]

 

THE ASSOCIATED PRESS - March 29, 2011 - 4:00 am - http://www.therepublic.com/view/story/0e4b7b11132749359a5a2d27a4764a61/MI--Cameras-in-Court/

 

LANSING, Mich. — Every oral argument at the Michigan Supreme Court is on a government TV channel. So why has the appeals court sometimes denied video recording of its cases?

 

Supreme Court Justice Stephen Markman says it's time to revisit the rule after a three-judge panel at the appeals court refused to allow video during arguments in a medical-marijuana case last fall.

 

Judges Henry William Saad and David Sawyer based their decision on the "fair administration of justice," but they didn't explain just what that meant. A documentary maker wanted to record the arguments in a closely watched case.

 

Markman says there have been major changes in technology as well as attitudes on public access to the workings of government.

[Eric L. VanDussen]

 

THE ASSOCIATED PRESS - March 29, 2011 - 4:00 am - http://www.therepublic.com/view/story/0e4b7b11132749359a5a2d27a4764a61/MI--Cameras-in-Court/

 

LANSING, Mich. — Every oral argument at the Michigan Supreme Court is on a government TV channel. So why has the appeals court sometimes denied video recording of its cases?

 

Supreme Court Justice Stephen Markman says it's time to revisit the rule after a three-judge panel at the appeals court refused to allow video during arguments in a medical-marijuana case last fall.

 

Judges Henry William Saad and David Sawyer based their decision on the "fair administration of justice," but they didn't explain just what that meant. A documentary maker wanted to record the arguments in a closely watched case.

 

Markman says there have been major changes in technology as well as attitudes on public access to the workings of government.